H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs James Blake H2H: 4-3

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 4–3 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 4–0 on hard courts, while James Blake leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #17 7-5 6-1 James Blake #13 Match data
Jan 23, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #9 7-5 6-4 7-6(4) James Blake #5 Match data
Mar 10, 2005* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #17 6-4 0-6 6-3 James Blake #151 Match data
Jan 13, 2005* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #23 7-6(4) 6-1 James Blake #96 Match data
Oct 29, 2003* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet James Blake #36 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #34 Match data
Oct 30, 2002* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet James Blake #27 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #17 Match data
May 11, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay James Blake #40 4-6 6-3 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,048 345 235 59.5% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #682 1,491 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,452 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,796 0 1
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 2,000 0 8
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,911 0 10
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2008 40–20 66.7% #10 1,888 0 10
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,848 0 10
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,841 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,788 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,714 0 10