H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 3-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Rome Masters third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 30, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #13 6-4 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #65 Match data
May 7, 2008* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #11 3-6 7-6(0) 7-6(6) Janko Tipsarevic #35 Match data
Jul 1, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Janko Tipsarevic #64 6-3 3-6 6-3 4-6 8-6 Fernando Gonzalez #6 Match data
Jun 14, 2007* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Fernando Gonzalez #6 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(7) Janko Tipsarevic #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4