H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 5-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 5–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2008 US Open third round 7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #11 7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 Jarkko Nieminen #37 Match data
Oct 27, 2007* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Jarkko Nieminen #29 6-3 7-5 Fernando Gonzalez #8 Match data
Jul 9, 2004* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #22 7-6(3) 6-1 Jarkko Nieminen #69 Match data
Feb 27, 2004* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #24 6-2 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #35 Match data
Jul 18, 2003* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #14 7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #28 Match data
Jun 4, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #20 6-3 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2