H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 2-1
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 2–1 lead over Joachim Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2006 Madrid Masters fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2006* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | (w/o) | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2003* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |