H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs John Isner H2H: 1-1

Fernando Gonzalez and John Isner are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Paris Masters second round 7-5 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Gonzalez #11 7-5 7-6(3) John Isner #35 Match data Nov 11, 2009* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
John Isner #40 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #11 Match data Nov 5, 2009* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,084 340 194 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,524 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,861 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,735 0 3 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2004 34–21 61.8% #23 1,771 0 4 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,893 0 7 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,977 0 7 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3
27 2008 37–16 69.8% #15 1,895 0 10 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,994 0 11 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,851 0 11 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,810 0 11 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,781 0 11 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Gonzalez John Isner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 17 8 25 68.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2004 15 11 26 57.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
24 2005 19 9 28 67.9% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 26 11 37 70.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 21 13 34 61.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
27 2008 18 12 30 60.0% 16 2 18 88.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
28 2009 21 12 33 63.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 161 104 265 60.8% 142 67 209 67.9% 22 13 35 62.9% 15 10 25 60.0% — 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 501/534 of Fernando Gonzalez's and 756/764 of John Isner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Gonzalez John Isner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.5 11.0 59.2% 70.6% 52.1% 71.8% 50.0% 59.8% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 12/13 6.3 8.3 56.5% 73.6% 44.7% 50.2% 40.3% 60.9% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 14/15 4.9 7.2 59.0% 64.0% 44.3% 53.8% 34.5% 55.8% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 51/61 7.5 5.5 59.6% 75.9% 51.2% 66.3% 45.8% 66.0% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 54/56 7.3 5.1 59.8% 73.9% 51.4% 59.8% 50.9% 64.5% 37.3% 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6%
23 2004 49/55 6.3 3.8 59.7% 74.4% 51.0% 56.4% 37.5% 64.8% 37.0% 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4%
24 2005 66/67 7.4 4.3 58.7% 77.8% 54.4% 60.6% 40.8% 68.1% 37.4% 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0%
25 2006 66/67 6.3 3.4 63.3% 73.3% 52.5% 65.1% 40.2% 65.5% 37.6% 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9%
26 2007 51/54 6.6 2.5 63.6% 72.6% 52.5% 57.9% 43.9% 65.3% 37.0% 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5%
27 2008 45/53 6.2 3.1 62.4% 73.2% 54.3% 64.0% 43.8% 66.1% 36.9% 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1%
28 2009 55/55 8.3 2.9 63.6% 77.2% 53.8% 67.4% 42.5% 68.6% 36.6% 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1%
29 2010 22/22 8.2 4.2 59.2% 77.2% 49.4% 66.2% 44.8% 65.8% 35.0% 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2%
30 2011 7/7 7.4 2.1 55.4% 76.5% 56.2% 66.0% 22.7% 67.5% 33.1% 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6%
31 2012 7/7 4.9 2.0 61.2% 67.8% 48.5% 53.1% 32.0% 60.0% 33.1% 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0%
Career — 501/534 7.0 4.0 60.9% 74.6% 52.1% 61.9% 42.4% 65.7% 37.0% — 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Gonzalez John Isner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1511 105.6 -1.67 -0.17 0.781 47.2% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1622 121.4 -1.12 +1.03 1.035 50.5% -12 -28 — 57.6% +0.52 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1524 97.3 -3.20 -2.78 0.764 45.2% +15 +53 — 39.0% -1.07 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1862 149.3 +3.57 +0.68 1.131 52.3% -55 -70 — 62.5% +0.77 10–9 (53%) 20–12 (63%) — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1736 139.9 +2.24 -0.64 1.051 51.0% -33 +148 — 55.8% +0.46 12–10 (55%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.01 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01
23 2004 1772 149.3 +2.09 +0.53 1.050 50.5% -18 +128 -182 57.8% +0.27 10–7 (59%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.95 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16
24 2005 1893 150.4 +5.23 +1.17 1.172 52.6% -23 +18 -165 64.7% +0.84 11–10 (52%) 18–11 (62%) — +1.02 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93
25 2006 1977 157.7 +3.14 +1.75 1.089 51.5% -6 -25 -185 62.1% +0.57 17–9 (65%) 16–11 (59%) — +0.01 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28
26 2007 1869 157.8 +2.59 +1.12 1.065 51.0% +61 +45 -58 57.0% +0.42 11–8 (58%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.42 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83
27 2008 1895 145.8 +2.46 +0.17 1.089 51.3% -20 +167 -83 63.6% +0.70 11–5 (69%) 19–11 (63%) — +1.26 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35
28 2009 1994 164.5 +5.52 +1.03 1.165 52.4% -28 +162 -147 67.4% +0.98 8–5 (62%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.25 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48
29 2010 1852 136.5 +1.61 -1.28 1.024 50.6% +68 +161 — 57.1% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.97 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24
30 2011 1811 116.1 +0.06 -0.31 1.016 50.2% — — +69 42.1% -0.21 — 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80
31 2012 1782 121.2 -1.27 -2.78 0.828 47.7% — +179 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.35 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74
Career — 2085 154.5 +2.93 +0.53 1.078 51.3% -11 +73 -114 60.0% +0.53 102–74 (58%) 132–95 (58%) 106.0 +1.22 — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.