H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 3-3

Fernando Gonzalez and Juan Ignacio Chela are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2007 Rome Masters quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #6 6-3 6-4 Juan Ignacio Chela #23 Match data
Jan 15, 2005* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #23 6-4 6-2 Juan Ignacio Chela #26 Match data
Aug 5, 2004* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #16 2-6 6-3 6-2 Fernando Gonzalez #23 Match data
Aug 21, 2003* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #34 4-6 7-6(8) 6-0 Fernando Gonzalez #15 Match data
Aug 14, 2003* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #37 6-2 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #17 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Fernando Gonzalez #43 6-3 3-6 1-6 7-5 6-3 Juan Ignacio Chela #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6