H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2005 New Haven third round 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2005* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |