H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 4-2

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 4–2 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Indian Wells Masters second round 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #17 4-6 6-2 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #77 Match data
Jan 21, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #14 5-7 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #70 Match data
Jan 21, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-2 6-2 5-7 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #19 Match data
Feb 19, 2004* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #13 6-2 6-1 Fernando Gonzalez #25 Match data
May 17, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #23 6-1 3-6 6-0 Lleyton Hewitt #1 Match data
Aug 11, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-7(3) 7-5 6-2 Fernando Gonzalez #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30