H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Marat Safin H2H: 5-2

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 5–2 lead over Marat Safin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2009 Beijing fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2009* Beijing ATP 500 R16 Hard Marat Safin #59 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #12 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Fernando Gonzalez #15 6-3 7-6(3) Marat Safin #76 Match data
May 3, 2008* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #15 6-3 7-5 Marat Safin #84 Match data
Jul 28, 2006* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #17 6-4 7-5 Marat Safin #97 Match data
Jun 30, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Fernando Gonzalez #11 4-6 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 6-4 Marat Safin #87 Match data
May 31, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-3 1-6 6-3 6-1 Marat Safin #53 Match data
Mar 23, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Marat Safin #7 6-3 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Marat Safin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 — — — — — — —