H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Mario Ancic H2H: 2-3

Mario Ancic holds a 3–2 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mario Ancic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mario Ancic won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-5 3-6 6-3.

CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
CRO Age 42 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mario Ancic #72 7-5 3-6 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #12 Match data
Jan 14, 2006* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Mario Ancic #21 6-0 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #11 Match data
May 12, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Mario Ancic #21 6-3 7-6(1) Fernando Gonzalez #23 Match data
Apr 14, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #26 6-2 7-6(4) Mario Ancic #20 Match data
Aug 1, 2003* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #14 7-5 7-6(5) Mario Ancic #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Mario Ancic #475 #7 2,075 2,019 193 124 60.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Mario Ancic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2002 3–7 30.0% #89 1,531 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2003 14–18 43.8% #74 1,621 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2004 26–21 55.3% #29 1,732 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2005 42–23 64.6% #21 1,798 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2006 52–18 74.3% #9 1,954 0 3
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2007 13–10 56.5% #83 1,880 0 3
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2008 29–17 63.0% #36 1,903 0 3
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2009 12–7 63.2% #95 1,905 0 3
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2010 2–3 40.0% #478 1,866 0 3
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11