H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 3-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Kuala Lumpur quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2009* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 QF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #12 6-3 6-4 Mikhail Youzhny #52 Match data
Oct 31, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mikhail Youzhny #18 3-6 6-3 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #9 Match data
May 11, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-4 5-7 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #38 Match data
Jun 29, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Fernando Gonzalez #24 7-6(3) 7-6(5) 6-3 Mikhail Youzhny #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10