H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 3-1
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2005 Kitzbuhel fourth round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2005* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2004* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-6(1) 6-0 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2002* | Basel | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 7-6(3) | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2002* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Nicolas Lapentti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |