H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Mahut holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2012 Miami Open first round 7-5 4-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Mahut #92 7-5 4-6 7-6(3) Fernando Gonzalez #221 Match data Mar 23, 2012* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,084 340 194 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,524 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,861 0 3 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,735 0 3 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2004 34–21 61.8% #23 1,771 0 4 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,893 0 7 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,977 0 7 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2008 37–16 69.8% #15 1,895 0 10 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,994 0 11 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,851 0 11 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,810 0 11 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,781 0 11 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 17 8 25 68.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2004 15 11 26 57.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2005 19 9 28 67.9% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2006 26 11 37 70.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2007 21 13 34 61.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2008 18 12 30 60.0% 16 2 18 88.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2009 21 12 33 63.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 161 104 265 60.8% 142 67 209 67.9% 22 13 35 62.9% 15 10 25 60.0% — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 501/534 of Fernando Gonzalez's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.5 11.0 59.2% 70.6% 52.1% 71.8% 50.0% 59.8% 31.4% 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 2000 12/13 6.3 8.3 56.5% 73.6% 44.7% 50.2% 40.3% 60.9% 40.5% 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 2001 14/15 4.9 7.2 59.0% 64.0% 44.3% 53.8% 34.5% 55.8% 33.8% 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 2002 51/61 7.5 5.5 59.6% 75.9% 51.2% 66.3% 45.8% 66.0% 38.4% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2003 54/56 7.3 5.1 59.8% 73.9% 51.4% 59.8% 50.9% 64.5% 37.3% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2004 49/55 6.3 3.8 59.7% 74.4% 51.0% 56.4% 37.5% 64.8% 37.0% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2005 66/67 7.4 4.3 58.7% 77.8% 54.4% 60.6% 40.8% 68.1% 37.4% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 2006 66/67 6.3 3.4 63.3% 73.3% 52.5% 65.1% 40.2% 65.5% 37.6% 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2007 51/54 6.6 2.5 63.6% 72.6% 52.5% 57.9% 43.9% 65.3% 37.0% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2008 45/53 6.2 3.1 62.4% 73.2% 54.3% 64.0% 43.8% 66.1% 36.9% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2009 55/55 8.3 2.9 63.6% 77.2% 53.8% 67.4% 42.5% 68.6% 36.6% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2010 22/22 8.2 4.2 59.2% 77.2% 49.4% 66.2% 44.8% 65.8% 35.0% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2011 7/7 7.4 2.1 55.4% 76.5% 56.2% 66.0% 22.7% 67.5% 33.1% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 2012 7/7 4.9 2.0 61.2% 67.8% 48.5% 53.1% 32.0% 60.0% 33.1% 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
Career — 501/534 7.0 4.0 60.9% 74.6% 52.1% 61.9% 42.4% 65.7% 37.0% — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1511 105.6 -1.67 -0.17 0.781 47.2% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 0–1 — +0.05 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11
19 2000 1622 121.4 -1.12 +1.03 1.035 50.5% -12 -28 — 57.6% +0.52 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.85 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 2001 1524 97.3 -3.20 -2.78 0.764 45.2% +15 +53 — 39.0% -1.07 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.83 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
21 2002 1862 149.3 +3.57 +0.68 1.131 52.3% -55 -70 — 62.5% +0.77 10–9 (53%) 20–12 (63%) 109.2 +0.58 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 -0.20
22 2003 1736 139.9 +2.24 -0.64 1.051 51.0% -33 +148 — 55.8% +0.46 12–10 (55%) 13–11 (54%) 98.8 +1.01 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.6 +0.16
23 2004 1772 149.3 +2.09 +0.53 1.050 50.5% -18 +128 -182 57.8% +0.27 10–7 (59%) 12–11 (52%) 104.0 -0.95 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50
24 2005 1893 150.4 +5.23 +1.17 1.172 52.6% -23 +18 -165 64.7% +0.84 11–10 (52%) 18–11 (62%) 101.9 +1.02 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) 100.3 -1.54
25 2006 1977 157.7 +3.14 +1.75 1.089 51.5% -6 -25 -185 62.1% +0.57 17–9 (65%) 16–11 (59%) 103.3 +0.01 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 101.5 -1.38
26 2007 1869 157.8 +2.59 +1.12 1.065 51.0% +61 +45 -58 57.0% +0.42 11–8 (58%) 15–9 (63%) 101.1 +0.42 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) 97.7 -1.66
27 2008 1895 145.8 +2.46 +0.17 1.089 51.3% -20 +167 -83 63.6% +0.70 11–5 (69%) 19–11 (63%) 104.4 +1.26 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
28 2009 1994 164.5 +5.52 +1.03 1.165 52.4% -28 +162 -147 67.4% +0.98 8–5 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 99.4 -0.25 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 96.5 -0.59
29 2010 1852 136.5 +1.61 -1.28 1.024 50.6% +68 +161 — 57.1% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) 99.6 +0.97 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -0.18
30 2011 1811 116.1 +0.06 -0.31 1.016 50.2% — — +69 42.1% -0.21 — 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) 101.2 -1.76
31 2012 1782 121.2 -1.27 -2.78 0.828 47.7% — +179 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.35 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 +0.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) 97.4 +0.82
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) 105.4 +0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) 103.5 +1.44
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 +0.80
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.4 +0.03
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 98.8 +0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2085 154.5 +2.93 +0.53 1.078 51.3% -11 +73 -114 60.0% +0.53 102–74 (58%) 132–95 (58%) 106.0 +1.22 — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.