H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Nicolas Massu H2H: 5-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 5–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 US Open first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #11 6-3 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Massu #89 Match data
May 11, 2007* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #6 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Massu #59 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #13 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Massu #40 Match data
Feb 4, 2006* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Massu #69 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #14 Match data
Feb 14, 2004* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Gonzalez #36 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Massu #14 Match data
May 7, 2000* Orlando ATP 250 F Clay Fernando Gonzalez #352 6-2 6-3 Nicolas Massu #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Nicolas Massu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5