H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 0-6

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 6–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2009 Shanghai Masters fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 2009* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 6-3 7-5 Fernando Gonzalez #12 Match data
Aug 14, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #8 7-6(2) 7-5 Fernando Gonzalez #10 Match data
Nov 12, 2007 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-4 6-3 Fernando Gonzalez #7 Match data
Aug 20, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nikolay Davydenko #7 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #18 Match data
May 6, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #49 2-6 6-2 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #15 Match data
Jul 12, 2002* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #95 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 — — — — — — — 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21