H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 19:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Olivier Rochus H2H: 2-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 2–0 lead over Olivier Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2010 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2005* | Auckland | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 6-2 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Olivier Rochus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 |