H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 0-4

Radek Stepanek holds a 4–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2010 New Haven third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2010* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #30 6-2 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #29 Match data
Mar 30, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #19 7-6(1) 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #13 Match data
Aug 8, 2007* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #60 6-7(2) 7-6(1) 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #6 Match data
May 30, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Radek Stepanek #58 6-2 6-2 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5