H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Taylor Dent H2H: 0-1
Taylor Dent holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2003 US Open third round 7-6(9) 6-7(3) 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 7-6(9) 6-7(3) 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |