H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Thiago Alves H2H: 2-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 2–0 lead over Thiago Alves in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-2 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-2 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Thiago Alves | Match data |
| Jan 29, 2007 | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-2 6-2 | Thiago Alves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Thiago Alves | #885 | #88 | 755 | 1,631 | 7 | 23 | 23.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Thiago Alves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #383 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #150 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |