H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-3

Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Canada Masters second round 6-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 2003* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #30 6-2 (ret.) Fernando Gonzalez #13 Match data
Aug 3, 2003* Washington ATP 250 F Hard Tim Henman #38 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #14 Match data
Aug 8, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #39 7-6(3) 6-2 Tim Henman #4 Match data
May 8, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #55 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Sep 1, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-4 6-2 Fernando Gonzalez #128 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11