H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Tim Henman H2H: 2-3

Tim Henman holds a 3–2 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Canadian Open round of 64 6-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #30 6-2 (ret.) Fernando Gonzalez #13 Match data Aug 6, 2003* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #38 6-3 6-4 Fernando Gonzalez #14 Match data Aug 3, 2003* F Washington Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Fernando Gonzalez #39 7-6(3) 6-2 Tim Henman #4 Match data Aug 8, 2002* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Fernando Gonzalez #55 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 Tim Henman #5 Match data May 8, 2002* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-4 6-2 Fernando Gonzalez #128 Match data Sep 1, 2000* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,084 340 194 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,524 0 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,861 0 3 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,735 0 3 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2004 34–21 61.8% #23 1,771 0 4 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,893 0 7 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,977 0 7 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2008 37–16 69.8% #15 1,895 0 10 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,994 0 11 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,851 0 11 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,810 0 11 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,781 0 11 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2002 17 8 25 68.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 2003 14 14 28 50.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2004 15 11 26 57.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2005 19 9 28 67.9% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2006 26 11 37 70.3% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2007 21 13 34 61.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2008 18 12 30 60.0% 16 2 18 88.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2009 21 12 33 63.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 161 104 265 60.8% 142 67 209 67.9% 22 13 35 62.9% 15 10 25 60.0% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 501/534 of Fernando Gonzalez's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.5 11.0 59.2% 70.6% 52.1% 71.8% 50.0% 59.8% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 12/13 6.3 8.3 56.5% 73.6% 44.7% 50.2% 40.3% 60.9% 40.5% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 2001 14/15 4.9 7.2 59.0% 64.0% 44.3% 53.8% 34.5% 55.8% 33.8% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 2002 51/61 7.5 5.5 59.6% 75.9% 51.2% 66.3% 45.8% 66.0% 38.4% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 2003 54/56 7.3 5.1 59.8% 73.9% 51.4% 59.8% 50.9% 64.5% 37.3% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2004 49/55 6.3 3.8 59.7% 74.4% 51.0% 56.4% 37.5% 64.8% 37.0% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2005 66/67 7.4 4.3 58.7% 77.8% 54.4% 60.6% 40.8% 68.1% 37.4% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2006 66/67 6.3 3.4 63.3% 73.3% 52.5% 65.1% 40.2% 65.5% 37.6% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2007 51/54 6.6 2.5 63.6% 72.6% 52.5% 57.9% 43.9% 65.3% 37.0% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2008 45/53 6.2 3.1 62.4% 73.2% 54.3% 64.0% 43.8% 66.1% 36.9% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2009 55/55 8.3 2.9 63.6% 77.2% 53.8% 67.4% 42.5% 68.6% 36.6% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2010 22/22 8.2 4.2 59.2% 77.2% 49.4% 66.2% 44.8% 65.8% 35.0% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2011 7/7 7.4 2.1 55.4% 76.5% 56.2% 66.0% 22.7% 67.5% 33.1% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2012 7/7 4.9 2.0 61.2% 67.8% 48.5% 53.1% 32.0% 60.0% 33.1% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
Career — 501/534 7.0 4.0 60.9% 74.6% 52.1% 61.9% 42.4% 65.7% 37.0% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1511 105.6 -1.67 -0.17 0.781 47.2% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1622 121.4 -1.12 +1.03 1.035 50.5% -12 -28 — 57.6% +0.52 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.85 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 2001 1524 97.3 -3.20 -2.78 0.764 45.2% +15 +53 — 39.0% -1.07 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.83 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 2002 1862 149.3 +3.57 +0.68 1.131 52.3% -55 -70 — 62.5% +0.77 10–9 (53%) 20–12 (63%) — +0.58 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 2003 1736 139.9 +2.24 -0.64 1.051 51.0% -33 +148 — 55.8% +0.46 12–10 (55%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.01 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2004 1772 149.3 +2.09 +0.53 1.050 50.5% -18 +128 -182 57.8% +0.27 10–7 (59%) 12–11 (52%) — -0.95 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2005 1893 150.4 +5.23 +1.17 1.172 52.6% -23 +18 -165 64.7% +0.84 11–10 (52%) 18–11 (62%) — +1.02 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2006 1977 157.7 +3.14 +1.75 1.089 51.5% -6 -25 -185 62.1% +0.57 17–9 (65%) 16–11 (59%) — +0.01 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2007 1869 157.8 +2.59 +1.12 1.065 51.0% +61 +45 -58 57.0% +0.42 11–8 (58%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.42 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2008 1895 145.8 +2.46 +0.17 1.089 51.3% -20 +167 -83 63.6% +0.70 11–5 (69%) 19–11 (63%) — +1.26 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2009 1994 164.5 +5.52 +1.03 1.165 52.4% -28 +162 -147 67.4% +0.98 8–5 (62%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.25 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2010 1852 136.5 +1.61 -1.28 1.024 50.6% +68 +161 — 57.1% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.97 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2011 1811 116.1 +0.06 -0.31 1.016 50.2% — — +69 42.1% -0.21 — 1–3 (25%) — -0.01 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2012 1782 121.2 -1.27 -2.78 0.828 47.7% — +179 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.35 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
Career — 2085 154.5 +2.93 +0.53 1.078 51.3% -11 +73 -114 60.0% +0.53 102–74 (58%) 132–95 (58%) 106.0 +1.22 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.