H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Tommy Haas H2H: 3-1

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2009 Canada Masters third round 7-6(2) RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2009* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #10 7-6(2) (ret.) Tommy Haas #20 Match data
Aug 8, 2009* Washington ATP 500 QF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #11 7-5 6-4 Tommy Haas #23 Match data
Mar 13, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #9 6-3 6-2 Fernando Gonzalez #5 Match data
Jan 27, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Fernando Gonzalez #9 6-1 6-3 6-1 Tommy Haas #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15