H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 3-2

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–2 lead over Tommy Robredo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 2–1 on clay, while Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2007 Beijing final 6-1 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Gonzalez
CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 16, 2007* Beijing ATP 500 F Hard Fernando Gonzalez #7 6-1 3-6 6-1 Tommy Robredo #11 Match data
May 1, 2004* Barcelona ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Robredo #26 4-6 7-5 7-6(2) Fernando Gonzalez #16 Match data
Jul 19, 2003* Stuttgart ATP 250 SF Clay Tommy Robredo #20 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Fernando Gonzalez #14 Match data
Jan 18, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #140 6-2 6-4 6-4 Tommy Robredo #36 Match data
Feb 15, 2001* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 R32 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #111 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) Tommy Robredo #107 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 — — — — — — — 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12