H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 2–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2006 Indianapolis fourth round 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-4 7-6(7) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2004* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-5 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fernando Gonzalez | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |