H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fernando Luna vs Antonio Zugarelli H2H: 1-0
Fernando Luna holds a 1–0 lead over Antonio Zugarelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Luna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1980 Rome second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1980* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-2 6-4 | Antonio Zugarelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antonio Zugarelli | #827 | #24 | 0 | 1,788 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Luna | Antonio Zugarelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #107 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #135 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #287 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |