H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fernando Luna vs Belus Prajoux H2H: 0-1
Belus Prajoux holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Belus Prajoux leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belus Prajoux won the 1980 Boston third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 71
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1980* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Belus Prajoux | 6-2 7-6 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Belus Prajoux | #941 | #62 | 0 | 1,729 | 81 | 128 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Luna | Belus Prajoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #116 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #111 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #154 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #154 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |