H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Fernando Luna vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-2
Claudio Panatta holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Claudio Panatta leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Panatta won the 1988 Palermo fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1988* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Claudio Panatta | 6-1 6-1 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
| May 15, 1984* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Claudio Panatta | 7-5 6-1 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1982* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 7-6 6-1 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Luna | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |