H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Fernando Luna vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 3-1

Fernando Luna holds a 3–1 lead over Joakim Nystrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Luna leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1986 Madrid round of 16 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Joakim Nystrom
SWE Age 63 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joakim Nystrom #7 6-3 7-6 Fernando Luna #69 Match data May 2, 1986* R16 Madrid ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Luna #38 6-3 6-3 Joakim Nystrom #29 Match data May 9, 1984* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Luna #46 6-1 6-4 Joakim Nystrom #31 Match data Apr 28, 1984* QF Aix En Provence ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Luna #85 7-5 6-1 Joakim Nystrom Match data Oct 8, 1980* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Joakim Nystrom #977 #7 54 2,121 257 136 65.4% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Luna Joakim Nystrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% #440 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1981 13–12 52.0% #69 1,645 0 0
19 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0 1982 9–14 39.1% #98 1,617 0 0
20 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0 1983 26–12 68.4% #27 1,867 0 1
21 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0 1984 56–20 73.7% #11 1,969 0 5
22 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,708 0 0 1985 50–21 70.4% #11 1,943 0 7
23 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0 1986 55–17 76.4% #7 1,926 0 12
24 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0 1987 33–16 67.3% #16 1,879 0 13
25 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0 1988 13–15 46.4% #69 1,730 0 13
26 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% #331 1,607 0 13
27 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Luna Joakim Nystrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
21 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 1984 20 4 24 83.3% 30 10 40 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — — 1985 14 6 20 70.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — — 1986 15 3 18 83.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3%
24 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — — 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 22 8 30 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — 60 31 91 65.9% 138 70 208 66.3% 23 12 35 65.7% 36 23 59 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Luna Joakim Nystrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1492 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1645 133.9 — — — — -78 +23 -103 46.8% -0.24 5–1 (83%) 0–5 (0%) 104.2 -0.49
19 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06 1982 1618 133.1 — — — — -103 +115 — 43.5% -0.32 2–4 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.7 -0.22
20 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24 1983 1868 149.9 — — — — -235 -70 -111 63.6% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.2 +0.17
21 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.7 +1.17 1984 1969 153.9 — — — — -39 -15 -234 65.1% +0.98 19–4 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 115.0 -0.15
22 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -1.05 1985 1943 156.7 — — — — +8 +26 -150 65.8% +1.19 12–9 (57%) 12–5 (71%) 100.2 +0.33
23 1981 1695 133.6 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 98.7 +1.18 1986 1926 163.8 — — — — +108 +4 -113 70.2% +1.58 13–7 (65%) 11–5 (69%) 103.2 -0.15
24 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.9 -0.88 1987 1880 153.1 — — — — -25 +138 -78 62.8% +0.97 9–5 (64%) 9–5 (64%) 103.3 -0.40
25 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +2.65 1988 1730 133.0 — — — — +3 +142 +66 47.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 3–6 (33%) 94.9 -1.25
26 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -0.03 1989 1608 95.3 — — — — +49 +152 — 30.8% -1.92 1–3 (25%) — — +0.53
27 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.2 -1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 96.1 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84 — 2121 156.2 — — — — +2 +44 -117 60.9% +0.82 76–41 (65%) 57–41 (58%) 108.6 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.