H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Fernando Luna vs Marty Davis H2H: 1-0
Fernando Luna holds a 1–0 lead over Marty Davis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Luna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1982 Linz fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1982* | Linz | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-4 6-1 | Marty Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marty Davis | #811 | #47 | 158 | 1,797 | 151 | 173 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Luna | Marty Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #269 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #84 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #96 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |