H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fernando Luna vs Mike Cahill H2H: 0-1
Mike Cahill holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mike Cahill leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mike Cahill won the 1982 Indianapolis second round 6-1 2-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1982 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Mike Cahill | 6-1 2-6 8-6 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mike Cahill | #448 | #58 | 0 | 1,727 | 100 | 155 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Luna | Mike Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #115 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #69 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #113 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #189 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #98 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |