H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Fernando Luna vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-0

Fernando Luna holds a 1–0 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Luna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1984 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 32 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Luna #45 6-4 4-6 6-2 Roscoe Tanner #84 Match data Jul 19, 1984* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Luna Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0
19 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0
20 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0
21 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,708 0 0 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Luna Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — — 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — — 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — — 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — — 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Luna Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
19 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17
20 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27
21 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.17 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40
22 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.05 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27
23 1981 1695 133.6 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.18 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74
24 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.88 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11
25 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) — +2.65 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49
26 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.03 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59
27 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.21 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91
28 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.24 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79
29 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51
30 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07
31 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.28 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29
32 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.14 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
33 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84 — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.