H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs A. Cherkasov H2H: 1-0
Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over A. Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1998 Prague third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1998* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-4 6-3 | A. Cherkasov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| A. Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | A. Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |