H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Fernando Meligeni holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Meligeni leads 2–0 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1999 Italian Open round of 64 6-1 6-2.

BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Meligeni #58 6-1 6-2 Cedric Pioline #29 Match data May 12, 1999* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Fernando Meligeni #46 6-0 5-7 6-1 Cedric Pioline #27 Match data Apr 30, 1999* R16 Prague ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Cedric Pioline #21 6-4 1-6 6-5 (ret.) Fernando Meligeni #66 Match data Jan 21, 1998* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 189 201 48.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,697 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1996 17–18 48.6% #94 1,679 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,714 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,654 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Meligeni Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 21 13 34 61.8% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 19 13 32 59.4% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1998 2 8 10 20.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 23 14 37 62.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2001 7 5 12 58.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 38 71 109 34.9% 149 120 269 55.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 325/390 of Fernando Meligeni's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Meligeni Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 4/4 3.0 1.8 51.5% 77.4% 58.7% 53.6% 25.6% 68.0% 35.5% —/—
21 1992 5/7 3.6 2.6 53.6% 62.4% 47.7% 36.8% 39.7% 55.4% 39.4% —/—
22 1993 11/13 4.3 2.5 55.5% 71.4% 50.4% 56.5% 47.6% 61.6% 40.2% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1994 30/33 2.3 1.9 56.1% 67.4% 52.6% 47.6% 42.2% 61.1% 38.5% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1995 35/40 3.3 2.7 51.9% 69.7% 46.1% 54.3% 45.5% 58.4% 41.5% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1996 24/35 3.0 4.1 54.2% 67.5% 44.8% 54.5% 47.9% 57.1% 40.1% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1997 35/43 4.1 3.1 57.6% 69.6% 48.2% 51.8% 44.0% 60.4% 39.9% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 1998 32/38 3.1 3.9 57.3% 69.6% 47.5% 59.7% 45.3% 60.0% 37.9% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 1999 39/53 3.2 3.4 58.4% 69.0% 49.8% 52.4% 42.1% 61.0% 40.1% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2000 29/35 3.3 4.1 58.4% 66.9% 43.6% 54.8% 43.6% 57.1% 38.6% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2001 31/33 4.8 3.9 55.4% 68.4% 52.6% 54.3% 41.8% 61.3% 38.7% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 2002 36/42 4.0 3.5 58.0% 69.4% 50.9% 60.1% 42.0% 61.3% 38.1% 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 2003 14/14 3.8 3.1 56.1% 67.3% 49.0% 63.2% 43.4% 59.5% 38.2% 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 —/— 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career 325/390 3.5 3.3 56.3% 68.8% 48.8% 54.6% 43.5% 59.9% 39.2% 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Meligeni Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1991 1515 104.5 +1.14 -1.78 1.110 50.9% +33 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 +0.13 1989 1483 114.0 +7 12.5% -1.88 0–1 -0.41
21 1992 1498 104.3 -2.12 -0.09 0.882 47.7% +22 +56 41.2% 0.00 1–1 0–2 +1.18 1990 1484 124.4 +14 +43 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) +0.10
22 1993 1555 121.4 -0.48 +0.93 1.046 50.8% +70 50.0% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) +0.81 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) -0.32
23 1994 1600 130.8 -0.28 -0.02 0.988 49.8% -139 +56 43.9% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) -0.77 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) -1.91
24 1995 1698 139.6 -1.20 +1.92 0.999 49.9% -228 +58 52.0% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) -0.61 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) -4.16
25 1996 1680 125.7 -2.61 +0.74 0.933 48.6% -210 +47 48.8% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 9–7 (56%) -0.66 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) -0.27
26 1997 1715 130.0 +0.03 +0.82 1.007 50.2% -163 +33 53.7% +0.24 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) +0.04 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) -3.16
27 1998 1655 134.6 -1.38 -0.50 0.948 49.4% -132 +72 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 8–8 (50%) -0.25 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) -1.10
28 1999 1685 146.4 0.00 +2.19 1.027 50.7% -179 +154 54.5% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–10 (38%) -1.85 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) -2.00
29 2000 1622 122.9 -3.48 +0.06 0.899 47.7% -120 +87 42.2% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) +0.73 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) -0.97
30 2001 1709 129.6 -0.09 +0.50 1.001 50.1% -108 +14 51.8% +0.11 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) -0.37 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) -2.23
31 2002 1651 130.9 -0.02 +0.44 0.984 49.8% -47 +51 43.1% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) +0.69 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) +0.89
32 2003 1638 118.4 -1.54 +0.56 0.943 49.0% -34 +15 42.4% -0.49 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) -0.74 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) -0.75
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) -2.76
Career 1889 137.9 -0.90 +0.70 0.979 49.7% -124 +66 49.3% -0.03 59–61 (49%) 58–65 (47%) 99.9 -0.43 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.