H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Fernando Meligeni holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Meligeni leads 2–0 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1999 Rome Masters second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 12, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Meligeni #58 6-1 6-2 Cedric Pioline #29 Match data
Apr 30, 1999* Prague ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Meligeni #46 6-0 5-7 6-1 Cedric Pioline #27 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Cedric Pioline #21 6-4 1-6 6-5 (ret.) Fernando Meligeni #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 185 199 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,696 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1996 13–16 44.8% #94 1,651 0 2 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,710 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,655 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5