H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs George Bastl H2H: 0-1

George Bastl holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, George Bastl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 1998 San Jose round of 32 6-1 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
George Bastl
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
George Bastl #284 6-1 2-6 6-3 Fernando Meligeni #72 Match data Feb 12, 1998* R32 San Jose ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 189 201 48.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
George Bastl #953 #71 569 1,656 47 85 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni George Bastl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #194 1,501 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,697 0 1 1999 6–7 46.2% #81 1,558 0 0
25 1996 17–18 48.6% #94 1,679 0 2 2000 15–22 40.5% #105 1,611 0 0
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,714 0 2 2001 10–15 40.0% #115 1,622 0 0
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,654 0 3 2002 3–9 25.0% #160 1,564 0 0
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 2003 0–3 0.0% #277 1,499 0 0
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 2004 0–1 0.0% #201 1,490 0 0
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 2005 4–7 36.4% #128 1,564 0 0
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 2006 5–8 38.5% #173 1,588 0 0
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 2007 1–4 20.0% #464 1,522 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #233 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #523 1,473 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Meligeni George Bastl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — 2001 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1998 2 8 10 20.0% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 23 14 37 62.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2001 7 5 12 58.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 71 109 34.9% 149 120 269 55.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — 37 51 88 42.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 3 13 16 18.8% 5 9 14 35.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 325/390 of Fernando Meligeni's and 122/132 of George Bastl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Meligeni George Bastl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 4/4 3.0 1.8 51.5% 77.4% 58.7% 53.6% 25.6% 68.0% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 5/7 3.6 2.6 53.6% 62.4% 47.7% 36.8% 39.7% 55.4% 39.4% 1996 1/1 4.0 2.0 65.0% 67.3% 53.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.5% 26.9%
22 1993 11/13 4.3 2.5 55.5% 71.4% 50.4% 56.5% 47.6% 61.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 30/33 2.3 1.9 56.1% 67.4% 52.6% 47.6% 42.2% 61.1% 38.5% 1998 3/4 4.0 3.3 72.6% 63.1% 43.7% 47.1% 30.0% 57.6% 33.1%
24 1995 35/40 3.3 2.7 51.9% 69.7% 46.1% 54.3% 45.5% 58.4% 41.5% 1999 11/13 5.1 3.2 63.5% 68.4% 48.1% 57.2% 41.1% 61.1% 37.7%
25 1996 24/35 3.0 4.1 54.2% 67.5% 44.8% 54.5% 47.9% 57.1% 40.1% 2000 32/37 3.8 2.8 66.2% 63.9% 48.5% 58.5% 37.4% 58.6% 39.3%
26 1997 35/43 4.1 3.1 57.6% 69.6% 48.2% 51.8% 44.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2001 23/25 6.3 1.9 69.0% 64.5% 49.6% 50.3% 44.1% 60.2% 38.5%
27 1998 32/38 3.1 3.9 57.3% 69.6% 47.5% 59.7% 45.3% 60.0% 37.9% 2002 12/12 5.8 5.0 62.9% 67.2% 44.2% 58.8% 27.8% 58.5% 32.7%
28 1999 39/53 3.2 3.4 58.4% 69.0% 49.8% 52.4% 42.1% 61.0% 40.1% 2003 3/3 1.0 1.7 67.6% 64.9% 46.2% 47.8% 33.3% 59.0% 26.5%
29 2000 29/35 3.3 4.1 58.4% 66.9% 43.6% 54.8% 43.6% 57.1% 38.6% 2004 1/1 8.0 2.0 69.4% 71.2% 42.3% 71.4% 50.0% 62.4% 31.9%
30 2001 31/33 4.8 3.9 55.4% 68.4% 52.6% 54.3% 41.8% 61.3% 38.7% 2005 11/11 5.9 3.0 59.7% 62.9% 47.8% 59.8% 46.0% 58.4% 36.6%
31 2002 36/42 4.0 3.5 58.0% 69.4% 50.9% 60.1% 42.0% 61.3% 38.1% 2006 13/13 6.9 3.5 57.3% 71.7% 44.5% 56.0% 30.4% 60.1% 34.1%
32 2003 14/14 3.8 3.1 56.1% 67.3% 49.0% 63.2% 43.4% 59.5% 38.2% 2007 5/5 6.0 3.0 65.7% 71.4% 40.6% 51.0% 15.5% 60.7% 33.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 5.8 2.6 63.6% 65.8% 50.9% 58.0% 31.2% 60.6% 29.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.5 4.5 52.3% 69.4% 41.4% 31.0% 49.1% 56.0% 42.4%
Career — 325/390 3.5 3.3 56.3% 68.8% 48.8% 54.6% 43.5% 59.9% 39.2% — 122/132 5.3 3.0 64.5% 66.1% 47.2% 55.4% 36.9% 59.4% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Meligeni George Bastl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1991 1515 104.5 +1.14 -1.78 1.110 50.9% +33 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1498 104.3 -2.12 -0.09 0.882 47.7% +22 +56 — 41.2% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +1.18 1996 1495 106.7 -1.02 +6.41 0.716 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
22 1993 1555 121.4 -0.48 +0.93 1.046 50.8% — +70 — 50.0% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1600 130.8 -0.28 -0.02 0.988 49.8% -139 +56 — 43.9% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.77 1998 1502 110.8 -1.46 +0.40 0.781 46.0% — — — 30.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — -0.32
24 1995 1698 139.6 -1.20 +1.92 0.999 49.9% -228 +58 — 52.0% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.61 1999 1559 129.2 -0.33 +1.04 0.969 49.6% +50 — — 50.0% -0.03 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.94
25 1996 1680 125.7 -2.61 +0.74 0.933 48.6% -210 +47 — 48.8% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.66 2000 1611 132.3 -2.50 +1.37 0.949 49.0% +51 -110 -122 40.7% -0.52 6–4 (60%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.59
26 1997 1715 130.0 +0.03 +0.82 1.007 50.2% -163 +33 — 53.7% +0.24 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.04 2001 1622 126.7 -1.08 +0.30 0.967 49.3% +92 -173 — 41.7% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.23
27 1998 1655 134.6 -1.38 -0.50 0.948 49.4% -132 +72 — 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.25 2002 1564 112.2 -2.22 -2.35 0.786 45.8% +54 — -26 31.3% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
28 1999 1685 146.4 0.00 +2.19 1.027 50.7% -179 +154 — 54.5% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.85 2003 1500 93.7 -3.02 +0.52 0.647 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.05
29 2000 1622 122.9 -3.48 +0.06 0.899 47.7% -120 +87 — 42.2% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.73 2004 1491 102.5 -1.47 +0.15 0.847 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
30 2001 1709 129.6 -0.09 +0.50 1.001 50.1% -108 +14 — 51.8% +0.11 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.37 2005 1564 113.3 -2.00 -0.81 0.880 47.3% +41 — — 37.0% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
31 2002 1651 130.9 -0.02 +0.44 0.984 49.8% -47 +51 — 43.1% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.69 2006 1589 118.6 -2.70 -0.72 0.853 47.5% +30 — -49 35.7% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
32 2003 1638 118.4 -1.54 +0.56 0.943 49.0% -34 +15 — 42.4% -0.49 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.74 2007 1523 107.1 -2.47 -1.23 0.863 47.0% +43 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1619 114.2 -0.33 -1.38 0.737 45.5% +36 — — 25.0% -1.42 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1473 105.8 -1.01 +0.84 0.965 48.7% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1426 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1402 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1386 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1375 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 137.9 -0.90 +0.70 0.979 49.7% -124 +66 — 49.3% -0.03 59–61 (49%) 58–65 (47%) 99.9 -0.43 — 1656 119.8 -1.84 +0.11 0.895 48.0% +55 -135 -62 37.8% -0.72 16–22 (42%) 22–31 (42%) 95.6 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.