H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Grant Stafford H2H: 0-2

Grant Stafford holds a 2–0 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Grant Stafford leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Stafford won the 1997 Orlando quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Grant Stafford
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grant Stafford #73 6-3 6-4 Fernando Meligeni #72 Match data Apr 26, 1997* QF Orlando World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Grant Stafford #279 3-6 6-4 6-4 Fernando Meligeni #68 Match data Feb 21, 1996* R64 Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 189 201 48.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Grant Stafford #1,161 #53 750 1,807 83 111 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Grant Stafford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1991 5–6 45.5% #172 1,552 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #191 1,635 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 1993 17–14 54.8% #86 1,717 0 0
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 1994 11–21 34.4% #168 1,558 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,697 0 1 1995 2–7 22.2% #288 1,530 0 0
25 1996 17–18 48.6% #94 1,679 0 2 1996 10–13 43.5% #83 1,563 0 0
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,714 0 2 1997 21–20 51.2% #74 1,657 0 0
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,654 0 3 1998 12–21 36.4% #163 1,564 0 0
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 1999 0–3 0.0% #475 1,535 0 0
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 2000 1–1 50.0% #435 1,592 0 0
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Meligeni Grant Stafford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1993 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1998 2 8 10 20.0% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1998 8 12 20 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 23 14 37 62.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 7 5 12 58.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 71 109 34.9% 149 120 269 55.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — 53 70 123 43.1% 7 14 21 33.3% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 8 11 27.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 325/390 of Fernando Meligeni's and 168/193 of Grant Stafford's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Meligeni Grant Stafford
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 4/4 3.0 1.8 51.5% 77.4% 58.7% 53.6% 25.6% 68.0% 35.5% 1991 10/11 1.6 2.9 66.6% 61.7% 43.9% 53.1% 40.6% 55.5% 39.0%
21 1992 5/7 3.6 2.6 53.6% 62.4% 47.7% 36.8% 39.7% 55.4% 39.4% 1992 8/8 3.6 5.8 60.4% 64.4% 34.5% 42.1% 40.5% 53.0% 42.7%
22 1993 11/13 4.3 2.5 55.5% 71.4% 50.4% 56.5% 47.6% 61.6% 40.2% 1993 25/31 2.3 3.2 61.9% 66.5% 46.6% 53.3% 50.5% 59.1% 44.0%
23 1994 30/33 2.3 1.9 56.1% 67.4% 52.6% 47.6% 42.2% 61.1% 38.5% 1994 26/32 2.3 4.2 60.8% 64.3% 43.2% 48.3% 39.9% 56.0% 39.8%
24 1995 35/40 3.3 2.7 51.9% 69.7% 46.1% 54.3% 45.5% 58.4% 41.5% 1995 7/9 3.7 4.7 61.7% 64.6% 44.0% 53.7% 40.4% 56.3% 39.2%
25 1996 24/35 3.0 4.1 54.2% 67.5% 44.8% 54.5% 47.9% 57.1% 40.1% 1996 22/23 4.9 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 49.0% 61.2% 37.6% 61.8% 38.5%
26 1997 35/43 4.1 3.1 57.6% 69.6% 48.2% 51.8% 44.0% 60.4% 39.9% 1997 36/41 4.8 3.5 55.4% 71.7% 51.0% 53.0% 53.2% 62.4% 41.1%
27 1998 32/38 3.1 3.9 57.3% 69.6% 47.5% 59.7% 45.3% 60.0% 37.9% 1998 30/33 3.9 4.3 56.9% 67.1% 44.0% 49.0% 33.6% 57.0% 38.4%
28 1999 39/53 3.2 3.4 58.4% 69.0% 49.8% 52.4% 42.1% 61.0% 40.1% 1999 2/3 1.5 6.5 61.6% 70.0% 34.4% 45.2% 13.3% 56.4% 35.6%
29 2000 29/35 3.3 4.1 58.4% 66.9% 43.6% 54.8% 43.6% 57.1% 38.6% 2000 2/2 8.0 7.5 61.9% 79.4% 48.2% 59.2% 34.2% 68.1% 39.9%
30 2001 31/33 4.8 3.9 55.4% 68.4% 52.6% 54.3% 41.8% 61.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 36/42 4.0 3.5 58.0% 69.4% 50.9% 60.1% 42.0% 61.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 14/14 3.8 3.1 56.1% 67.3% 49.0% 63.2% 43.4% 59.5% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 325/390 3.5 3.3 56.3% 68.8% 48.8% 54.6% 43.5% 59.9% 39.2% — 168/194 3.6 3.8 59.4% 67.6% 45.9% 52.2% 42.6% 58.8% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Meligeni Grant Stafford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1493 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.11
20 1991 1515 104.5 +1.14 -1.78 1.110 50.9% +33 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 1991 1553 120.2 -2.74 +0.10 0.877 47.4% +35 — — 37.9% -0.86 4–0 (100%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
21 1992 1498 104.3 -2.12 -0.09 0.882 47.7% +22 +56 — 41.2% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +1.18 1992 1636 116.0 -2.73 +2.89 0.909 47.9% -35 — +9 52.4% -0.43 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.68
22 1993 1555 121.4 -0.48 +0.93 1.046 50.8% — +70 — 50.0% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.81 1993 1718 129.9 -1.48 +4.18 1.076 51.6% -17 — -65 55.2% +0.18 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.11
23 1994 1600 130.8 -0.28 -0.02 0.988 49.8% -139 +56 — 43.9% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.77 1994 1558 130.9 -3.88 +1.31 0.904 47.9% +81 -50 +43 40.5% -0.46 3–10 (23%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.87
24 1995 1698 139.6 -1.20 +1.92 0.999 49.9% -228 +58 — 52.0% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.61 1995 1530 116.1 -1.20 +0.97 0.895 47.6% +80 — — 32.0% -0.92 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.12
25 1996 1680 125.7 -2.61 +0.74 0.933 48.6% -210 +47 — 48.8% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.66 1996 1563 122.3 -0.43 -0.01 1.008 50.1% +9 — +95 48.3% +0.05 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.72
26 1997 1715 130.0 +0.03 +0.82 1.007 50.2% -163 +33 — 53.7% +0.24 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.04 1997 1658 134.1 +0.10 +3.52 1.093 51.4% -32 -111 +67 50.0% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.14
27 1998 1655 134.6 -1.38 -0.50 0.948 49.4% -132 +72 — 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.25 1998 1565 127.0 -3.40 +0.46 0.893 47.5% +59 -78 +128 39.2% -0.82 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.07
28 1999 1685 146.4 0.00 +2.19 1.027 50.7% -179 +154 — 54.5% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.85 1999 1535 103.1 +1.15 -0.33 0.817 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.86 — — — -0.39
29 2000 1622 122.9 -3.48 +0.06 0.899 47.7% -120 +87 — 42.2% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.73 2000 1592 112.5 +0.96 +1.20 1.250 53.0% — — — 62.5% +0.63 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
30 2001 1709 129.6 -0.09 +0.50 1.001 50.1% -108 +14 — 51.8% +0.11 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1651 130.9 -0.02 +0.44 0.984 49.8% -47 +51 — 43.1% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1638 118.4 -1.54 +0.56 0.943 49.0% -34 +15 — 42.4% -0.49 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 137.9 -0.90 +0.70 0.979 49.7% -124 +66 — 49.3% -0.03 59–61 (49%) 58–65 (47%) 99.9 -0.43 — 1808 133.9 -1.78 +1.85 0.977 49.4% +21 -80 +52 44.8% -0.34 26–38 (41%) 27–27 (50%) 100.0 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.