H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Guillermo Coria H2H: 2-1
Fernando Meligeni holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Coria in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2002 Estoril fourth round 5-7 6-3 4-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2002* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 5-7 6-3 4-4 (ret.) | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Fernando Meligeni | 6-4 3-6 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Guillermo Coria | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Coria | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Guillermo Coria | #1,121 | #3 | 3,770 | 2,114 | 211 | 113 | 65.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Guillermo Coria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #44 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 61–17 | 78.2% | #5 | 2,009 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,923 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,865 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #116 | 1,671 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #577 | 1,575 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |