H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-2
Hicham Arazi holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2003 Casablanca fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2003* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 6-0 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1999* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-2 6-2 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1997* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 2-6 6-1 7-6(8) | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |