H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-0
Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1997 New Haven second round 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1997* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Fernando Meligeni | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Jeff Tarango | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jeff Tarango | #1,001 | #42 | 877 | 1,787 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Jeff Tarango | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #377 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #96 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #131 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #91 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #78 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #73 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #323 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #730 | 1,446 | 0 | 2 |