H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-0
Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2002 Acapulco semifinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2002* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-2 6-4 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |