H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Karim Alami H2H: 2-2
Fernando Meligeni and Karim Alami are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2001 Buenos Aires third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 7-5 6-4 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2000* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 7-5 6-3 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1996* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Karim Alami | 6-4 7-6(4) | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1995* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Karim Alami | 6-2 6-2 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |