H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Mark Petchey H2H: 1-0
Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1995 Mexico City quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1995* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |