H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 1-1

Fernando Meligeni and Markus Hipfl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on clay, while Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2001 Long Island round of 32 6-2 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Meligeni #89 6-2 7-6(3) Markus Hipfl #73 Match data Aug 23, 2001* R32 Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Markus Hipfl #73 4-6 6-4 6-0 Fernando Meligeni #28 Match data Aug 12, 1999* R32 San Marino ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 189 201 48.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,697 0 1 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 1996 17–18 48.6% #94 1,679 0 2 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,714 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,654 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Meligeni Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — — — — — 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 2 8 10 20.0% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 23 14 37 62.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 7 5 12 58.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 71 109 34.9% 149 120 269 55.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 325/390 of Fernando Meligeni's and 116/133 of Markus Hipfl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Meligeni Markus Hipfl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 1/1 1.0 6.0 66.2% 57.8% 39.1% 71.4% 0.0% 51.5% 27.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 2.0 6.0 49.1% 51.9% 39.3% 16.7% 20.0% 45.5% 34.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/3 1.7 4.3 43.0% 62.8% 49.0% 60.8% 40.6% 54.8% 40.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/2 1.0 2.0 50.9% 62.1% 44.6% 50.0% 80.0% 53.5% 46.3%
20 1991 4/4 3.0 1.8 51.5% 77.4% 58.7% 53.6% 25.6% 68.0% 35.5% 1998 5/6 2.4 1.6 67.6% 60.0% 50.6% 51.0% 33.6% 56.7% 38.8%
21 1992 5/7 3.6 2.6 53.6% 62.4% 47.7% 36.8% 39.7% 55.4% 39.4% 1999 26/30 2.3 1.8 66.3% 66.5% 49.6% 37.2% 42.6% 61.0% 42.0%
22 1993 11/13 4.3 2.5 55.5% 71.4% 50.4% 56.5% 47.6% 61.6% 40.2% 2000 16/20 2.1 2.2 64.6% 64.9% 50.9% 54.0% 52.2% 59.7% 39.1%
23 1994 30/33 2.3 1.9 56.1% 67.4% 52.6% 47.6% 42.2% 61.1% 38.5% 2001 26/32 2.1 2.9 61.4% 63.6% 48.6% 51.5% 38.5% 58.1% 39.9%
24 1995 35/40 3.3 2.7 51.9% 69.7% 46.1% 54.3% 45.5% 58.4% 41.5% 2002 27/28 3.3 2.2 65.1% 63.3% 50.1% 50.8% 46.7% 58.2% 39.0%
25 1996 24/35 3.0 4.1 54.2% 67.5% 44.8% 54.5% 47.9% 57.1% 40.1% 2003 9/9 0.9 1.9 71.7% 56.3% 41.2% 46.4% 38.4% 52.0% 33.3%
26 1997 35/43 4.1 3.1 57.6% 69.6% 48.2% 51.8% 44.0% 60.4% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 32/38 3.1 3.9 57.3% 69.6% 47.5% 59.7% 45.3% 60.0% 37.9% 2005 1/1 3.0 4.0 63.1% 60.4% 48.4% 71.4% 40.0% 56.0% 39.0%
28 1999 39/53 3.2 3.4 58.4% 69.0% 49.8% 52.4% 42.1% 61.0% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 29/35 3.3 4.1 58.4% 66.9% 43.6% 54.8% 43.6% 57.1% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 31/33 4.8 3.9 55.4% 68.4% 52.6% 54.3% 41.8% 61.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 36/42 4.0 3.5 58.0% 69.4% 50.9% 60.1% 42.0% 61.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 14/14 3.8 3.1 56.1% 67.3% 49.0% 63.2% 43.4% 59.5% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 325/390 3.5 3.3 56.3% 68.8% 48.8% 54.6% 43.5% 59.9% 39.2% — 116/133 2.3 2.4 64.2% 63.4% 48.8% 48.3% 42.9% 58.2% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Meligeni Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1991 1515 104.5 +1.14 -1.78 1.110 50.9% +33 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 1992 1498 104.3 -2.12 -0.09 0.882 47.7% +22 +56 — 41.2% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +1.18 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 1993 1555 121.4 -0.48 +0.93 1.046 50.8% — +70 — 50.0% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.81 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 1994 1600 130.8 -0.28 -0.02 0.988 49.8% -139 +56 — 43.9% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.77 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 1995 1698 139.6 -1.20 +1.92 0.999 49.9% -228 +58 — 52.0% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.61 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 1996 1680 125.7 -2.61 +0.74 0.933 48.6% -210 +47 — 48.8% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.66 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 1997 1715 130.0 +0.03 +0.82 1.007 50.2% -163 +33 — 53.7% +0.24 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.04 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1655 134.6 -1.38 -0.50 0.948 49.4% -132 +72 — 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.25 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
28 1999 1685 146.4 0.00 +2.19 1.027 50.7% -179 +154 — 54.5% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1622 122.9 -3.48 +0.06 0.899 47.7% -120 +87 — 42.2% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1709 129.6 -0.09 +0.50 1.001 50.1% -108 +14 — 51.8% +0.11 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1651 130.9 -0.02 +0.44 0.984 49.8% -47 +51 — 43.1% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1638 118.4 -1.54 +0.56 0.943 49.0% -34 +15 — 42.4% -0.49 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 137.9 -0.90 +0.70 0.979 49.7% -124 +66 — 49.3% -0.03 59–61 (49%) 58–65 (47%) 99.9 -0.43 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.