H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Meligeni vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 1-1
Fernando Meligeni and Markus Hipfl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on clay, while Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2001 Long Island third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2001* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Fernando Meligeni | 6-2 7-6(3) | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1999* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Markus Hipfl | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Meligeni | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |