H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Takao Suzuki H2H: 1-0

Fernando Meligeni holds a 1–0 lead over Takao Suzuki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Meligeni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 2002 Washington Open round of 64 6-4 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Meligeni
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Takao Suzuki
JPN Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Meligeni #61 6-4 7-6(1) Takao Suzuki #119 Match data Aug 14, 2002* R64 Washington Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 189 201 48.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Takao Suzuki #1,016 #102 470 1,669 23 34 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Takao Suzuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #487 1,473 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #517 1,493 0 0
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #272 1,506 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,544 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 1999 1–9 10.0% #262 1,462 0 0
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #160 1,477 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,697 0 1 2001 3–2 60.0% #225 1,516 0 0
25 1996 17–18 48.6% #94 1,679 0 2 2002 2–4 33.3% #136 1,506 0 0
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,714 0 2 2003 4–3 57.1% #205 1,609 0 0
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,654 0 3 2004 2–3 40.0% #212 1,610 0 0
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 2005 1–2 33.3% #272 1,588 0 0
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 2006 3–1 75.0% #471 1,619 0 0
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 2007 0–1 0.0% #241 1,543 0 0
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 2008 2–1 66.7% #509 1,543 0 0
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 2009 0–1 0.0% #282 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Meligeni Takao Suzuki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 4 7 11 36.4% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 1998 2 8 10 20.0% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 23 14 37 62.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 7 5 12 58.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 71 109 34.9% 149 120 269 55.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — 22 29 51 43.1% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 325/390 of Fernando Meligeni's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Meligeni Takao Suzuki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 4/4 3.0 1.8 51.5% 77.4% 58.7% 53.6% 25.6% 68.0% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 5/7 3.6 2.6 53.6% 62.4% 47.7% 36.8% 39.7% 55.4% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 11/13 4.3 2.5 55.5% 71.4% 50.4% 56.5% 47.6% 61.6% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 30/33 2.3 1.9 56.1% 67.4% 52.6% 47.6% 42.2% 61.1% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 35/40 3.3 2.7 51.9% 69.7% 46.1% 54.3% 45.5% 58.4% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 24/35 3.0 4.1 54.2% 67.5% 44.8% 54.5% 47.9% 57.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 35/43 4.1 3.1 57.6% 69.6% 48.2% 51.8% 44.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2003 7/7 7.7 3.1 58.1% 73.1% 52.8% 74.9% 39.7% 65.0% 34.3%
27 1998 32/38 3.1 3.9 57.3% 69.6% 47.5% 59.7% 45.3% 60.0% 37.9% 2004 5/5 11.8 3.8 62.6% 75.8% 48.5% 49.7% 52.6% 65.6% 32.4%
28 1999 39/53 3.2 3.4 58.4% 69.0% 49.8% 52.4% 42.1% 61.0% 40.1% 2005 3/3 10.3 2.7 64.5% 73.2% 58.4% 82.3% 63.9% 67.6% 29.6%
29 2000 29/35 3.3 4.1 58.4% 66.9% 43.6% 54.8% 43.6% 57.1% 38.6% 2006 4/4 12.8 2.5 62.7% 80.9% 66.7% 87.5% 50.0% 75.5% 29.2%
30 2001 31/33 4.8 3.9 55.4% 68.4% 52.6% 54.3% 41.8% 61.3% 38.7% 2007 1/1 12.0 4.0 54.3% 76.5% 60.5% 50.0% 14.3% 69.1% 32.4%
31 2002 36/42 4.0 3.5 58.0% 69.4% 50.9% 60.1% 42.0% 61.3% 38.1% 2008 3/3 12.0 2.3 60.0% 77.6% 50.9% 68.4% 44.4% 66.4% 33.0%
32 2003 14/14 3.8 3.1 56.1% 67.3% 49.0% 63.2% 43.4% 59.5% 38.2% 2009 1/1 4.0 2.0 60.9% 57.1% 72.2% 0.0% 0.0% 63.0% 26.7%
Career — 325/390 3.5 3.3 56.3% 68.8% 48.8% 54.6% 43.5% 59.9% 39.2% — 24/57 10.3 3.0 60.8% 75.0% 55.8% 67.7% 45.0% 67.5% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Meligeni Takao Suzuki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1473 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1493 109.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
20 1991 1515 104.5 +1.14 -1.78 1.110 50.9% +33 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.13 1997 1507 105.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.04
21 1992 1498 104.3 -2.12 -0.09 0.882 47.7% +22 +56 — 41.2% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +1.18 1998 1545 118.3 — — — — +30 — — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.29
22 1993 1555 121.4 -0.48 +0.93 1.046 50.8% — +70 — 50.0% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 +0.81 1999 1462 115.1 — — — — +53 — — 30.0% -1.20 0–4 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 -0.13
23 1994 1600 130.8 -0.28 -0.02 0.988 49.8% -139 +56 — 43.9% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.5 -0.77 2000 1477 103.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.17
24 1995 1698 139.6 -1.20 +1.92 0.999 49.9% -228 +58 — 52.0% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–7 (50%) 100.1 -0.61 2001 1517 105.7 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.21 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.26
25 1996 1680 125.7 -2.61 +0.74 0.933 48.6% -210 +47 — 48.8% -0.22 8–6 (57%) 9–7 (56%) 104.3 -0.66 2002 1506 104.2 — — — — +14 — — 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–1 — +0.27
26 1997 1715 130.0 +0.03 +0.82 1.007 50.2% -163 +33 — 53.7% +0.24 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.7 +0.04 2003 1609 114.1 -2.01 -0.21 0.982 49.9% -33 — — 56.3% -0.13 — 4–1 (80%) — +0.23
27 1998 1655 134.6 -1.38 -0.50 0.948 49.4% -132 +72 — 52.9% +0.21 3–6 (33%) 8–8 (50%) 97.0 -0.25 2004 1611 113.5 +1.14 -2.01 0.942 49.1% +12 — — 42.9% -0.86 1–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.08
28 1999 1685 146.4 0.00 +2.19 1.027 50.7% -179 +154 — 54.5% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–10 (38%) 95.1 -1.85 2005 1588 114.1 -0.19 +2.68 0.913 49.3% +55 — — 44.4% +0.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2000 1622 122.9 -3.48 +0.06 0.899 47.7% -120 +87 — 42.2% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 103.6 +0.73 2006 1619 124.5 +2.96 -0.08 1.193 53.1% +51 — — 63.6% +1.28 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 +0.05
30 2001 1709 129.6 -0.09 +0.50 1.001 50.1% -108 +14 — 51.8% +0.11 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 -0.37 2007 1544 100.8 -3.25 +0.61 1.049 50.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.05
31 2002 1651 130.9 -0.02 +0.44 0.984 49.8% -47 +51 — 43.1% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) 98.4 +0.69 2008 1543 102.7 +1.12 -0.43 0.981 50.2% +54 — — 62.5% -0.13 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.15
32 2003 1638 118.4 -1.54 +0.56 0.943 49.0% -34 +15 — 42.4% -0.49 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 -0.74 2009 1541 112.1 +2.43 +1.00 0.722 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 106.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1512 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1508 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 137.9 -0.90 +0.70 0.979 49.7% -124 +66 — 49.3% -0.03 59–61 (49%) 58–65 (47%) 99.9 -0.43 — 1669 118.5 +0.23 -0.15 0.981 49.9% +27 — — 43.2% -0.56 9–11 (45%) 18–15 (55%) 105.7 +0.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.