H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 2-2

Fernando Meligeni and Thomas Johansson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Meligeni leads 2–0 on clay, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.

BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Thomas Johansson #57 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 Fernando Meligeni #100 Match data
May 5, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Meligeni #62 7-5 6-1 Thomas Johansson #19 Match data
Sep 2, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Thomas Johansson #33 7-6(5) 6-3 7-6(3) Fernando Meligeni #48 Match data
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fernando Meligeni #58 6-4 6-2 6-4 Thomas Johansson #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 185 199 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,696 0 1 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 1996 13–16 44.8% #94 1,651 0 2 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,710 0 2 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,655 0 3 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9