H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Meligeni vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 3-0

Fernando Meligeni holds a 3–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Meligeni leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1998 Roland Garros third round 7-5 6-3 6-2.

BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Fernando Meligeni #58 7-5 6-3 6-2 Todd Woodbridge #35 Match data
May 10, 1996* Pinehurst ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Meligeni #76 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #28 Match data
Mar 8, 1994* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Fernando Meligeni #99 6-1 6-3 Todd Woodbridge #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 185 199 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,857 237 229 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Meligeni Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,702 0 0
21 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #54 1,684 0 0
22 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,664 0 0
23 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,661 0 0
24 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,696 0 1 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,810 0 1
25 1996 13–16 44.8% #94 1,651 0 2 1996 32–23 58.2% #36 1,744 0 1
26 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,710 0 2 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,796 0 2
27 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,655 0 3 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,714 0 2
28 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,601 0 2
29 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,596 0 2
31 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3
32 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3