H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Roese vs Chris Pridham H2H: 0-3
Chris Pridham holds a 3–0 lead over Fernando Roese in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Pridham leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1993 Seoul third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1993* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Pridham | 6-3 6-4 | Fernando Roese | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1992* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Chris Pridham | 7-6(9) 6-3 | Fernando Roese | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1991* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chris Pridham | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Fernando Roese | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Roese | #739 | #92 | 384 | 1,538 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Roese | Chris Pridham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #258 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #252 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |