H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 4-4

Fernando Verdasco and Benjamin Becker are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2015 Roland Garros second round 6-4 0-6 1-6 7-5 10-8.

ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Benjamin Becker #48 6-4 0-6 1-6 7-5 10-8 Fernando Verdasco #34 Match data
Jan 5, 2011* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard Benjamin Becker #53 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Oct 1, 2010* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Benjamin Becker #65 6-4 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data
Feb 12, 2010* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #11 7-5 6-2 Benjamin Becker #40 Match data
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #10 7-5 6-4 7-5 Benjamin Becker #45 Match data
Jun 19, 2009* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Benjamin Becker #82 7-5 7-6(4) Fernando Verdasco #8 Match data
Mar 28, 2009* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #9 6-3 6-4 Benjamin Becker #127 Match data
Jun 30, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Fernando Verdasco #30 6-4 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 9-7 Benjamin Becker #161 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,851 153 215 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,725 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,642 0 0
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,811 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,724 0 1
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,725 0 1
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2013 9–19 32.1% #79 1,767 0 1
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2014 27–25 51.9% #40 1,835 0 1
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,732 0 1
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,734 0 1
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,591 0 1
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7