H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Daniele Bracciali H2H: 2-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 2–1 lead over Daniele Bracciali in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on clay, while Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniele Bracciali won the 2006 Moscow round of 32 6-7(4) 6-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Daniele Bracciali
ITA Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniele Bracciali #67 6-7(4) 6-4 (ret.) Fernando Verdasco #26 Match data Oct 12, 2006* R32 Moscow ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Fernando Verdasco #28 5-7 6-4 6-4 Daniele Bracciali #65 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Palermo ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #24 6-3 6-1 Daniele Bracciali #50 Match data Jul 14, 2006* R16 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Daniele Bracciali #923 #49 752 1,711 33 51 39.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Daniele Bracciali
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #950 1,483 0 0
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1 1998 2–1 66.7% #207 1,538 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5 2004 1–2 33.3% #147 1,540 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5 2005 6–9 40.0% #81 1,635 0 0
28 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5 2006 18–24 42.9% #65 1,628 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5 2007 6–14 30.0% #258 1,578 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fernando Verdasco Daniele Bracciali
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
21 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 5 11 16 31.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — 9 21 30 30.0% 10 14 24 41.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 5 8 13 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's and 82/84 of Daniele Bracciali's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fernando Verdasco Daniele Bracciali
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 1/1 5.0 1.0 51.7% 63.3% 39.3% 33.3% 50.0% 51.7% 32.0%
18 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3% 1998 2/3 11.0 4.5 52.3% 79.9% 47.7% 77.1% 18.2% 64.6% 34.2%
21 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3% 2004 3/3 8.0 3.7 57.7% 74.6% 48.0% 36.5% 37.8% 63.4% 34.1%
27 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1% 2005 15/15 9.0 3.3 51.9% 76.2% 52.3% 57.3% 29.1% 64.6% 33.2%
28 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3% 2006 41/42 8.2 3.0 51.8% 75.2% 51.2% 67.1% 38.9% 63.6% 33.1%
29 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4% 2007 20/20 4.6 2.1 54.8% 68.2% 45.1% 60.5% 30.1% 57.7% 31.6%
30 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3% — 82/84 7.5 2.9 52.8% 73.6% 49.6% 62.4% 34.5% 62.2% 32.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fernando Verdasco Daniele Bracciali
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1484 97.8 -3.54 -2.94 0.663 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20
18 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.34 1998 1538 102.4 +0.57 +0.51 0.965 48.7% — — +113 50.0% +0.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.21
21 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) — +1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) — -0.23 2003 1535 103.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.41 2004 1541 101.5 -1.08 -0.19 0.930 48.5% — — — 36.4% -0.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.33
27 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.03 2005 1635 121.8 +0.50 -0.85 0.937 48.9% -44 -85 +49 42.2% -0.62 3–2 (60%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.31
28 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.32 2006 1629 126.1 +0.86 -3.21 0.909 48.6% -94 -12 +102 43.3% -0.39 6–8 (43%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.14
29 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.19 2007 1578 125.7 -2.80 -3.12 0.745 45.0% -15 -1 — 31.7% -1.56 — 4–3 (57%) — -0.63
30 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) — -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) — -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) — -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38 2014 1559 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90 — 1712 123.5 -0.23 -2.55 0.867 47.7% -61 -25 +89 40.5% -0.65 11–10 (52%) 20–20 (50%) 104.2 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.