H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Denis Istomin H2H: 3-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–1 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2013 Sydney fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Denis Istomin
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 11, 2013* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Denis Istomin #46 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #24 Match data
May 8, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #19 7-5 6-2 Denis Istomin #45 Match data
Feb 12, 2011* San Jose ATP 250 QF Hard Fernando Verdasco #9 6-4 6-4 Denis Istomin #49 Match data
Feb 13, 2010* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Fernando Verdasco #11 6-3 2-6 6-4 Denis Istomin #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —