H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Donald Young H2H: 4-0

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2017 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Donald Young
USA Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 2017* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fernando Verdasco #37 6-3 6-3 Donald Young #45 Match data
Oct 29, 2014* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #33 4-6 6-1 6-3 Donald Young #61 Match data
Apr 12, 2014* Houston ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #29 7-6(1) 6-1 Donald Young #91 Match data
Sep 28, 2012* Bangkok ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #23 7-5 6-4 Donald Young #124 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,942 125 187 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Donald Young
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,467 0 0
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,497 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,526 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,557 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2012 5–23 17.9% #190 1,590 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,695 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,801 0 0
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,790 0 0
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,728 0 0
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,649 0 0
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —