H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 4-1

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–1 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2013 Paris Masters second round 7-6(3) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 2013* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #34 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Ernests Gulbis #24 Match data
Jun 30, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Fernando Verdasco #54 6-2 6-4 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #39 Match data
Apr 25, 2013* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Ernests Gulbis #53 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #35 Match data
Jul 13, 2012* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Fernando Verdasco #16 6-2 3-6 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #78 Match data
Apr 24, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #9 6-2 7-6(4) Ernests Gulbis #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —